AIDS to Resolution: An Introduction
When
I was a second year surgical resident, the Center for Disease Control
published, in the June 5th 1981 issue of Morbidity and Mortality
World Report, the first report of a new disease among gay men. In
the twenty years since the recognition of AIDS, the severity of
the epidemic has matched the glummest predictions. Unfortunately,
here in North America, it is clear that we are still in the early
phases of the epidemic. As any good infectious disease doctor will
tell a medical student, the time to make a difference in terms of
lives saved and disease averted is in the early stages of an epidemic,
not when it has run its course. Yet apart from a flurry of articles
marking the milestone of two decades with a renewed interest in
the disease's devastation in Africa, AIDS has all but dropped off
the radar screen in the US. The question "Why?" has many answers,
but there are no excuses. AIDS is and will continue to be a clear
and present danger to all sexually active individuals. The emphasis
on sexual activity is no accident. Worldwide over 80% of all cases
are heterosexually transmitted.
For
those of us who have forgotten "ancient" history, a brief recounting
is in order. Early on it was clear that AIDS was an infectious disease.
At first believed unique to homosexuals, it was rapidly identified
in other groups such as intravenous drug users and Haitians. This
early stratification of risks, along with the lack of cure, led
to much hysteria surrounding the disease and a great stigma associated
with it. Many Americans paid little attention to AIDS until reports
of disease transmission from blood transfusions began to surface.
The ensuing outcry led to the development of unparalleled safety
features around transfusions and an astounding decrease in all blood-borne
diseases. Transmission from transfusions is almost unheard of today
in the United States.* Campaigns to prevent infection were begun
in communities at risk; education in safe sex practices combined
with screening slashed rates of infection in the homosexual population
during the late 80s and early 90s; needle-exchange programs for
IV drug users lowered the rate of infection in NYC from 50% before
1990 to less than 20% in 2000 and dropped the annual infection rate
from 4% to 1%; prenatal screening programs combined with maternal
antiviral treatment and avoidance of breast feeding when the mother
is infected has dropped new infections in children (most of which
are maternal-to-child transmission) from 945 in 1992 to 155 in 1999.
Also,
for those who are unclear on the basics, I'll provide a brief overview.
(For those who would like to know more, there are literally thousands
of excellent sites on the Web; my server found nearly three million
hits when I typed in AIDS. One of my personal favorites is www.thebody.com.
It has links to many other sites.) AIDS stands for Acquired (meaning
can be caught) ImmunoDeficiency(weakness of the disease fighting
system of the body) Syndrome(group of health problems that make
a disease). It is caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus or
HIV.** People infected with the virus begin to produce antibodies
against it. The HIV test looks for these antibodies and that is
what it means if one is HIV positive. Being HIV positive is not
the same as having AIDS. Many people harbor the virus for years
before they get sick.
This
virus is an interesting type of virus known as a retrovirus; this
means it can insert its own genetic material into the DNA of the
infected person. This allows it to hide efficiently. It preferentially
targets the immune system; one measure of this is the CD4+ cells
(helper cells). Normally there are 500-1500 such cells in a milliliter
(drop) of blood. Without antiviral treatment, as these cells are
destroyed, symptoms such as fever, night sweats, swollen glands
or diarrhea develop. One officially has AIDS when the CD4+ cell
count is less than 200, or one develops an opportunistic infection
such as candida (a fungal infection of the throat or vagina), pneumocystis
carnii (a lung infection), cytomegalovirus (CMV which may affect
the eyes or brain) or Kaposi's sarcoma (a skin cancer). An opportunistic
infection is one caused by an organism (virus, fungus, bacterium
or parasite) that normally does not cause a problem but can when
the immune system is weakened.
Bodily
fluids of people infected with HIV carry the virus even if the person
does not look ill. In fact, healthy appearing individuals are probably
more likely to pass on the virus as their viral loads are often
higher than really ill people. Most people get HIV from exchanging
body fluids with an infected person: by having unprotected sex,
sharing needles, or being born of and/or breast feeding from an
infected mother. There have been no reports of infection from fluids
such as tears, but it is possible to acquire HIV from oral sex if
there are sores or cuts in the mouth. Up to one third of people
infected with HIV do not know they are infected; symptoms may be
so mild. And since it may take weeks or months for the body to begin
producing antibodies to the virus, an individual may be infected
and infectious without testing positive! To repeat, A NEGATIVE HIV
TEST IS NO GUARANTEE THAT A PERSON DOES NOT CARRY THE VIRUS! One
cannot rely on a negative test until it has been repeated after
a six-month interval, and if the partner has sex with someone else
in the interim, the clock gets reset!
Unfortunately,
no cure has yet been found. Antiviral therapies have been available
since the 80s but they can only slow down the progression of the
disease and, other than in the transmission of HIV from mother to
child, have not been shown to effectively prevent infection. The
introduction of HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) in
1996 slashed the death rate from AIDS by nearly 70% but it is only
a temporary breather; rates of infection in high risk groups, which
had been falling in the 90s, are now risingpresumably because
as people lose the fear of dying from AIDS, they begin to engage
in risky behavior again. These therapies are expensive and toxic,
requiring a mind-boggling adherence to schedules of multiple drugs.
Further, the virus is quite adaptable, mutating every time it replicates
(every 8 hours) so that it has the ability to easily develop drug
resistance. No good vaccine is yet on the horizon, in part because
of the unique ability of the virus to hide and mutate; 77 potential
vaccines have been tried to date with only two reaching final clinical
trials. Neither of the two is expected to perform well. This is
after over $800 million has been spent by the government alone on
AIDS research.
To
summarize some glum statistics: There has been an estimated 60 million
individuals infected with HIV in the last twenty years; 22 million
have died. There are 15,000 new infections daily, 95% of them in
the developing countries. In the US 800,000 individuals are HIV
positive; 300,000 of them living with AIDS. 440,000 have died from
AIDS (one sixth in NYC). There are 40,000 new infections in the
US annually. In the absence of a cure, ultimately, the vast majority
of these persons will be expected to die from AIDS. Historically
70% of these have been men but the demographics of those infected
are changing. The highest rates of infection are now in minorities,
women, and those under 25 years of age. If this trend continues,
we will develop a picture closer to that seen in other countries,
in which women comprise half of those infected. Younger women especially
are more vulnerable to infection due to immaturities of the reproductive
tract. Minorities will make up larger shares of those infected.
While the percent of the population infected is around 1% in North
America and Western Europe, rates are as high as 40% in parts of
Africa (46% in Kwazulu Natal province of South Africa). Rates of
infection continue to mushroom in India, China, SE Asia, and the
former Soviet Union. At these rates, it is estimated that in another
twenty years there will be 200 million people living with HIV (currently
there are 36 million).
I
know of no other devastating epidemic with such a high rate of infection,
except perhaps the plague of the Middle Ages; the consequence of
such devastation was long-term destabilization, politically and
economically, of an entire world, leading to the Dark Ages. This
is already occurring in Africa which has over 5000 AIDS deaths daily
and a projected number of 13 thousand daily by 2005. In ten years
there will be 40 million AIDS orphans in Africawill be, not
might be. Even if antivirals are given to these countries free of
charge, the infrastructure is lacking to deliver them and provide
the intensive support necessary to keep them working.
What
do these alarming figures mean to those of us who live in the relative
comfort and safety of the United States? It means that we cannot
continue to live in denial of the existence of this disease, its
modes of transmission, and the economic and political reasons fueling
its rapid spread in certain areas. I believe we have a moral obligation
to provide assistance to those countries suffering the devastation
of this disease, as well as financial and political reasons to do
so. The plague was contained centuries ago by quarantines, which
allowed the disease to run its course; we can no longer have such
luxury in the global village of today. For example, my transcription
in the office this week was handled by a company in India; I placed
an order from a catalog last night that was handled by another company
not on this continent; I have, within arm's reach, at least five
essential items, parts of which were either made or assembled on
four different continents, and my refrigerator contains foods not
grown in the United States.
We
must increase funding to continue looking into basic science as
so many questions are unanswered: Why are some people able to live
with HIV with a minimum of symptoms for years and others succumb
rapidly? How is the virus able to cause its damage and how can we
prevent that? What are the most cost-effective ways of containing
the epidemic? Future articles will deal with these and other issues.
The
next article will be from a local physician who is at the forefront
of the AIDS war in Sarasota County, Florida. Our community has
a surprisingly high number of HIV positive individuals, and here,
as well as in any other area, the admonishment to think globally,
act locally, holds.
In
the twenty years since I was that young resident who realized this
disease would have an impact on my future practice, I have seen
the silver lining to a dark cloud. Sagas of incredible heroism have
been superimposed over those of great tragedy and horror. I have
seen patients become empowered activistsno longer victims.
I have seen new understandings and treatments of this disease benefit
patients with other diseases . But I have seen that all this is
not enough.
I
welcome comments and suggestions for further articles.
Dr.
Marguerite Barnette
*This is true only for the US and developed nations.
Less than 10% of blood transfusions worldwide are screened for
HIV. Last year contaminated S. African blood was confiscated in
China, India and England, and in 1996 Austria seized several thousand
liters of contaminated blood that was being shipped to Third World
countries.
**There
has been some debate in the past over whether HIV is the true
cause of AIDS. These debates are chronicled at several Internet
sites. The vast majority of experts do not dispute that HIV is
the cause of AIDS. What causes confusion is the different ways
the disease can express itself. But this has been true of all
disease processes and is a function of an individual's genetics,
the organism's genetics and socioeconomic factors that influence
virulence. For example, in some individuals, TB is silent, detected
only by a skin test or X-ray, whereas in others it has a rapidly
fatal course despite antibiotics.
|