TUTANKHAMUN ON EGYPT'S THRONE AS A RESULT OF A MILITARY COUP
Recent
archaeological evidence indicates that Tutankhamun came to the
throne as a result of a military coup. A scene on the wall on
the tomb of Maya, the young king's nanny, discovered recently
in Saqqara by the French mission, included the five army generals
who are believed to have led the coup.
In
my book Moses Pharaoh of Egypt, published in 1990, I suggested that
Akhenaten did not die at the end of his 17-year reign, but was forced
to abdicate the throne by an army coup. Pharaoh Akhenaten, one of
the 18th dynasty kings who ruled Egypt for 17 years in the mid-14th
century BC, abolished the old Egyptian gods in favor of a new monotheistic
God, Aten, whose worship the king wanted to force upon his people.
Akhenaten relied completely on the army's support in his confrontation
with the old priesthood. Although he never took part in any war,
the king is shown, in the vast majority of representations, wearing
the Blue Crown or the short Nubian wig, both belonging to his military
headdress, rather than the traditional ceremonial crowns of the
Two Lands. Scenes of soldiers and military activity abound in both
the private and royal art of Amarna. If we may take the relief's
from the tombs of the nobles at face value, then his capital city
was virtually an armed camp. Everywhere we see parades and processions
of soldiers, infantry, and chariotry with their massed standards.
There are soldiers under arms standing guard in front of the palaces,
the temples, and in the watchtowers that bordered the city; scenes
of troops, unarmed or equipped with staves, carrying out combat
exercises in the presence of the king.
The
army, loyal to the throne, carried out the will of the king without
questioning. The position of Aye, Akhenaten's maternal uncle, as
the Commander General of the army, assured its loyalty to the ruling
dynasty. Aye held posts among the highest in the infantry and the
chariotry, together with Nakht Min, another general related to him.
It was the loyalty of the army, controlled by Aye, which kept Akhenaten
in power in the uneasy years following his coming to the throne
as sole ruler (upon the death of his father) in his 12th year. By
that time Akhenaten had developed his monotheistic ideas to a great
extent. If Aten was the only God, Akhenaten, as his sole son and
prophet, could not allow other gods to be worshipped at the same
time in his dominion. As a response to his rejection by the Amun
priests as a legitimate ruler, he had already snubbed Amun and abolished
his name from the walls and inscriptions of temples and tombs. Now
he took his ideas to their logical conclusion by abolishing, throughout
Egypt, the worship of any gods except Aten. He closed all the temples,
except those of Aten, confiscated their lands, dispersed the priests
and gave orders that the names of all deities should be expunged
from monuments and temple inscriptions throughout the country. Army
units were dispatched to excise the names of the ancient gods wherever
they were found written or carved.
At
least two events early in Akhenaten's co-regency with his father
Amenhotep III indicated strong opposition to his rule. The graffiti
of Amenhotep III's 30th year from the pyramid temple of Meidum,
which would be year 3 of Akhenaten, pointed to a rejection by some
powerful factions of the king's decision to cause 'the male to sit
upon the seat of his father.' Again, the border stele inscription
of Amarna shows that, before deciding to leave Thebes and build
his new city, Akhenaten had encountered some strong opposition and
had been the subject of verbal criticism. Certainly, he would not
have left the dynasty's capital without having been forced to do
so. The final confrontation between the throne and the priesthood
was postponed simply because after he departed from Thebes, Akhenaten
had nothing at all to do with the running of the country, which
was left to his father, Amenhotep III. Another important factor
was the complete reliance of Akhenaten on the armed forces for support.
If we may take the relief's from the tombs of the nobles at face
value, then the city was virtually an armed camp. Everywhere we
see processions and parades of soldiers, infantry and chariotry
with their massed standards. Palaces, temples and the city borders
seem to have been constantly guarded.
The
persecution of Amun and the other gods, which must have been exceedingly
hateful to the majority of the Egyptians, was also hateful to the
individual members of the army. This persecution, which entailed
the closing of the temples, the dispatch of artisans to hack out
his name from inscriptions, the banishment of the clergy, the excommunication
of his very name, could not have been carried out without the army's
active support. As the army shares the same religious beliefs as
the people, it is natural that the officers would not feel very
happy with the job they were doing. Thus a conflict appeared between
the army's loyalty to the king and its loyalty to the religious
beliefs of the nation. Ultimately, the harshness of the persecution
must have had a certain effect upon the soldiers, who themselves
had been raised in the old beliefs.
Archaeological
evidence to support this claim came in November 1997, when Dr. Alain
Zivie, a French archaeologist, announced in Cairo the discovery
of a new tomb in Saqqara. In this ancient necropolis of the Royal
City of Memphis, ten miles south of Cairo, Zivie uncovered the tomb
of Maya, wet-nurse of Tutankhamun. The tomb, which extends 20 meters
inside the mountain, was also used, from the beginning of the Macedonian
Ptolemic period at the start of the 3rd century BC, for the burial
of the sacred mummified cats of Bastet. When first found, the tomb
was almost completely full of mummified cats, placed there more
than a thousand years after the original burial. The joint team
from the French Archaeological Mission and the Supreme Council for
Egyptian Antiquities has excavated two of the three known chambers.
On the wall of the first chamber is a scene depicting Maya protecting
the King who is sitting on her knee. The inscriptions describe her
as 'the Royal nanny who breast-fed the pharaoh's body.'
Alongside and to the left of Maya's seat are six officials representing
Tutankhamun's Cabinet, two above and four below, each with different
facial characteristics. Although none of the officials is named,
Dr. Zivie was able to suggest their identities from their appearance
and the sign of office they carry. He recognized the two above and
behind Maya's seat as Aye and Horemheb. The four officials below
were identified by Zivie as Pa-Ramses, Seti, Nakht Min, and Maya.
Except for the last one, who is also called Maya the treasurer,
the remaining five were all military generals of the Egyptian army,
and four of them followed the king on the throne. This was the first
time in Egyptian history that the Cabinet was composed, almost totally,
of army generals, which supports my earlier view that Tutankhamun
came to the throne as a result of a military coup. These generals
could only have gained their positions in the cabinet, and later
on the throne, as a result of a military coup.
The
new evidence indicate that there must have been a kind of military
move against Akhenaten, led by three army generals: Horemheb, Ramses,
and Seti. Aye, the commander of the army, realized he could not
crush the rebellion even with the help of General Nakht Min. When
his attempt to persuade Akhenaten to allow the return of the old
gods failed, he tried to save the royal dynasty by reaching a compromise
with the leaders of the rebellion to allow the king to abdicate
and be replaced by his son Tutankhamun. Tutankhamun left his father's
capital of Amarna for Memphis in his fourth year, when a compromise
was reached in which all ancient temples were reopened and worship
restored. Nevertheless, Aten remained holding its supreme position,
at least as far as the new king was concerned.
Aye,
brother of Queen Tiye, Akhenaten's mother, is regarded as the military
protector of the Amarna kings, and was responsible for the Chariots
during the time of Akhenaten, while general Nakht Min is thought
to have been his relative. Akhenaten used the army to destroy the
old powerful priesthood and force his new monotheistic religion
on his people. But the army, which shared the same old beliefs as
the rest of the people, could not support the king to the end. It
is clear that Akhenaten faced, in his 17th year, an army rebellion
led by generals Horemheb, Pa-Ramses, and Seti. Aye, supported by
General Nakht Min, not being in a position to crush the rebellion,
made a deal with them to allow for the abdication of Akhenaten and
the appointment of his son, Tutankhamun, as his successor. This
would also explain how Aye, when he succeeded Tutankhamun on the
throne, disappeared mysteriously, together with Nakht Min, after
four years, while the three other generals rose to power. When Horemheb
followed Aye as king, he appointed both Pa-Ramses and his son Seti
as viziers and commanding generals of the army. They in turn succeeded
him on the throne as Ramses I (who established the 19th dynasty)
and Seti I.
Ahmed
Osman
Historian,
lecturer, researcher and author, Ahmed Osman is a British Egyptologist
born in Cairo
His
four in-depth books clarifying the history of the Bible and Egypt
are: Stranger
in the Valley of the Kings (1987) - Moses: Pharaoh
of Egypt (1990) - The House of the Messiah (1992)
- Out of Egypt (1998)
Click
the link below to support the work of our volunteer Internet publication:

|